[Schematron] errors in iso_dsdl_include.xsl beta

Florent Georges lists at fgeorges.org
Tue Sep 16 10:32:08 EDT 2008


"G. Ken Holman" wrote:

> But then you need a different keyword other than sch:include ...
> perhaps sch:merge ... but I don't think you can arbitrarily
> change the semantics of sch:include now that it has been out and
> implemented for a while.

  Yes, that is why I think it would be better to define a sch:import
statement that would resolve to a document the root of which is a
sch:schema.  Something like xs:import.

  See for instance http://markmail.org/message/3mw67kkj3uwcbwlj for an
implementation.

  Regards,

--drkm






















      



More information about the Schematron mailing list